Where do we go from here…? Building infrastructure for the future

A Guest Post from Eric Krusiewizc, AltsResearch, LLC

Private investors are reevaluating their portfolios as they attempt to understand the implications of the COVID-19 crisis on all aspects of the global economy.  With some perspective gained from prior cycles (and crises), combined with thoughtful consideration of the macro trends accelerating today, active investors will be able to participate in opportunistic returns being seeded by the crisis.

In the coming years, several macro themes will have emerged from the crisis as winners.  Distressed and special situations strategies will drive what has the potential to be historic returns in the buyout world.  While infrastructure investing, geared toward investors with very long-term investment horizons, will be fed by shifts in behaviors.

 

Download the full report: COVID-19-Strategies – Infrastructure-2020


Need a diligence refresher? Now’s the time to remember what NOT to do

A Guest Post by Eric Krusiewicz, Alts Research, LLC

Recently, I was asked to review an indirect private equity portfolio for a large start-up family office program.  The goal was a 360 review of the portfolio as well as the platform.  This meant, beyond reviewing the portfolio fund by fund to understand performance and exposures, I also needed to opine on the appropriateness of the diligence process that built the portfolio.

This reminded me that given the current season we are in, while diligence is always important, a tune-up refresher might be in order.

Going back to my review; I wanted to be thorough but not nit-picky, as there can be many paths on the diligence journey.   I took the approach of remembering what to AVOID when building a robust defensible diligence process and went from there.  Below, I highlight the top five considerations I like to keep in mind when performing due diligence: Continue reading


March 10, 2000 – “We have perfected venture capital, we will have no failures”

On March 10, 2000, I was at Cornell’s Johnson School about to start a lecture on private equity performance. It was the internet silly season and every university’s entrepreneurial programs were in full swing as everyone was convincing everyone else that:

  1. The old rules were no long in effect
  2. Anyone over the age of 30 was just clueless about how this new economy was working
  3. Anyone with a website was now an internet company
  4. Just show up with an idea and venture investors would chase you to your rental car in the parking lot and offer you a term sheet sight-unseen.
  5. Incubators were the future

To validate all this the new-tech laden NASDAQ was on a tear and on this particular day it hit an interday high of 5132.52 and closed at 5048.62 which was up 24% since the prior year end just 70 days earlier and was the 16th record for the year. This was an annualized return of 112% so was absolute proof that points 1 through 5 were true.

In the midst of all this, venture funds were trying to invent and re-invent themselves to keep up with the manic-panic of the prior five years of investing.

As I was waiting for my classroom to be cleared out, I stepped into the back of another classroom where a venture capital investor who had started an incubator was finishing up a guest lecture.

One final parting comment he made was particularly notable:

“We have perfected venture capital, we will have no failures”

My instinct was that it was a great ending catch-line for a bunch of eager-wanna-be-venture-investor students, but also found it to fairly typical of the hubris the industry felt at the time. Of course being an incubator, which was novel at the time, he probably meant that they wouldn’t let an idea out of the hatchery until it was truly market-tested and if it wasn’t they would rearrange or merge the prospect LEGO-blocks into an even better idea.

Anyway – fast forward 30 minutes, and I was chatting with a few students as I was prepping materials. One student came to me and asked if I had seen the lecture with the venture investor. I said I had and he asked if I had heard his last comment.

“Professor Reyes, if you were a technical analyst, would you consider that a market-top signaling event”

I chuckled with some off-hand remark and didn’t think about it again.

Who knew he was so prescient – I kinda wish I remember his name and hope he’s a stock analyst and hugely successful.

That day WAS the market peak as three days later, Japan entered a recession and by March 20 when MicroStrategy had to restate revenues due to aggressive accounting practices and fell 60%+, and then a never-ending cascade of “the emperor wears no clothes” news like Microsoft anti-trust ruling and the pets.com debacle and by year end the market had dropped 51% from that peak and most internet stocks had lost much more than that. The NASDAQ never got back to that level again until July 18, 2016.

Jesse Reyes


Venture and Buyout Returns Converge – Does it still make sense to invest in both?

One of the well documented cyclical features of private equity and venture capital returns is that for most of their history, there has been an inverse correlation between the two asset classes. That is, when times are good for venture, they are not as good for buyouts and vice versa.

The rationale for this has been that buyouts depend on low prices to generate good returns and when venture returns are elevated, pricing is less than optimal for buyouts.

To demonstrate this, I’ve plotted data from Burgiss’ PrivateIQ returns database for the most recent 20 years merged with data from some of my prior research.

This data plots five year trailing returns for each asset class. — Why five years? I’ve been using this particular metric for at least the last 20 years as a good mid-point weighted barometer of each industry’s returns. It’s the end of the investment period for most limited partnerships and is the mid-point of the typical 10-year life fund.

Five year trailing returns Venture vs Buyouts

Continue reading


Venture Capital has the best year since the Internet bubble burst — Renaissance or just a peek out of the Dark Ages?

VC-post-internet-returns-20131231

There have been numerous headlines heralding the venture capital industry’s comeback after the long decade post-internet boom and bust. Others have been skeptical and opine that venture capital’s glory years are long behind it and while we continue to have more IPO exits and home-run technology investments, the industry is but a shadow of itself.

We now have the data to examine whether the industry is in real recovery. In this post we’ll use the data from the Burgiss Private iQ system to examine the case for recovery. In the next post, we’ll examine some factors which might throw a bit of a shadow on that conclusion.

Continue reading


2013 Q3 Private Equity Performance – Continued Recovery ? (part 1)

by Jesse Reyes

The industry performance statistics for the US private equity for Q3 of 2013 have been available from Burgiss’ Private IQ market intelligence system for about a month.  Rather than rush to press with the latest and greatest news, I’ve spent some time doing a deep dive on what the latest set of numbers mean for the industry.  We will spend a bit of time over the next few posts analyzing the industry’s track record and putting these results in perspective.

2013 Q3 Results

Continue Reading the entire post


PME- A History

PME timeline

by Jesse Reyes

Cambridge Associates just announced a “New Method to compare public market and private market returns”. see press release

Comparing private equity returns to public market returns has always been problematic since private equity has been firmly ensconced in the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) while the public markets have been measured by time-weighted returns – the two returns are incommensurable directly (more on that in a later post)– although that doesn’t stop the financial and mainstream press from doing just that-much to my (as well as that of many of my quant’s brethren’s) chagrin.

The Cambridge Associates method is the latest in a series of alternative approaches to direct public/private market comparison which first surfaced about 20 years ago.

Continue reading


Standards–Back to the future

gips timeline

Several recent events brought to mind the issue of performance/reporting standards.

My good friend at Privcap, David Snow recently remarked in an August PrivCap Digest article  “Will relaxed rules on general solicitation mean tighter performance reporting requirements”. His point was that with general solicitation now a reality for private equity firms, would/should there be a call for more rigorous standardization and/or transparency in performance reporting.
Continue reading


Welcome to J-Curve

Welcome to J-Curve.

J-Curve.com is the home of J-Curve Advisors which was founded to advise general partners and other private equity professionals in navigating the increasingly complex quantitative environment they find themselves in.

J-curve provides commentary, information as well as advisory services to general partners and the industry at large.

This blog commentary is intended to provide a platform for analyzing published and unpublished research, data, techniques, and methodologies which impact quantitative analysis of the industry.  You should find this platform will be less about “news” and more about the metrics, statistics and analysis behind some of the news, thus creating a significant quantitative knowledgebase.

 

I have been fortunate to have developed a significant number of relationships with professionals in the private equity and venture capital industry over the past twenty-five years. Many of these professionals have contributed tremendously  to the body of knowledge concerning private equity research and quantitative analysis. Those relationships should find a home at j-curve as we review and analyze both proprietary and publicly-available research and data.

Our aim is to distill quantitative analysis to make it accessible for practitioner application, education and research. We will also highlight and comment on recent industry performance results and other statistics as they become available from our preferred partners.

We welcome contributors to this commentary.

Again, welcome to J-Curve and I hope this contributes as much to this knowledgebase as my many “quant” friends in the industry have.

 

Jesse Reyes